Archive for the ‘Global Warming’ Category
Danny Glover is, that’s who. I liked Danny in the Lethal Weapon series, but he needs to stick to the silver screen and keep away from science and politics.
From the Daily Telegraph:
Says Glover: “When we see what we did at the climate summit in Copenhagen, this is the response, this is what happens, you know what I’m sayin’?” His obscene opinion would be bigger news if Glover had – in the manner of others – idiotically blamed a less-fashionable deity.
The inestimable John R. Lott knows about the scientific method, data and how to interpret it, after all he does have a Ph.D. Today, John laid down the basic framework for discussing such things as global warming:
Science depends on good quality of data. It also relies on replication and sharing data. But the last couple of days have uncovered some shocking revelations…
If you weren’t vacationing in Rwanda, you would know that some hackers brought some rather interesting information to light, continues Dr. Lott:
…Computer hackers have obtained 160 megabytes of e-mails from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in England. These e-mails, which have now been confirmed as real, involved many researchers across the globe with ideologically similar advocates around the world. They were brazenly discussing the destruction and hiding of data that did not support global warming claims. The academics here also worked closely with the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
So there you have it. Global warming isn’t based on true science, but rather a belief that is reinforced with a priori arguments. While inductive reasoning is used when trying to prove a premise, what if the premise is wrong? Most progress is made with deductive reasoning which deconstructs observation and its data in an effort to find out why. Basically we use reason and logical analysis of the facts. When the data does not support a premise, we move on. In the case of global warming, reason is exchanged for dogma and politics. What ensues constitutes religion, not science and it is ironic, since these same “scientists” eschew creationism or even intelligent design. I guess it’s all in what you believe, not what you can prove, and if the collective says so, it must be true.
So, while the religion may seem to be global warming, I would contend it really is not. The UN is their church, and their religion is global marxism. Global warming is but one gospel from their play book. What are the other gospels? I can name a few: Socialized medicine, government controlled and regulated businesses, and generically regulating human behavior, to extreme, vis a vis gun control etc. Can you name a few?
Thank you for reading this blog.
The bar for requirements for senators has officially been lowered. Debbie Stabenow is one of the dumbest politicians I have heard in awhile. Dumber than even Chuck Grassley. Not only does the Senator from Michigan enthusiastically support Cap and Tax legislation, which would gut what is left of Detroit, but she knows global warming is a serious issue because of the storms she feels when she is flying. “They are more volatile”. “We are paying the price with more tornadoes and hurricanes”…Ms. Stabenow, Michigan and much of the country has had the couldest July on record. Not only that, how many hurricanes have hit the US this year? Stunad. Where do they find these assholes?
How long will it be before Chad Myers gets fired under a protest for not believing in the man caused global warming religion? If you think Islam is unforgiving of heresy, they have nothing on the left wing nut jobs that promulgate man caused global warming in order to further socialism. He’s lucky Ted is not in charge anymore. Thanks to JR.